WASH capacity mapping

 Key guidance and tools
 Other tools



Coordinate WASH sector capacity mapping and development

Implement WASH sector capacity mapping

Capacity mapping can take various forms, depending on its objectives and time-frame. A standard methodology is proposed by the GWC (refer to the key guidance: 2016 GWC Capacity Mapping At A Glance), presenting the following features:

  • It is based on a modular approach, so can be adapted based on time and resource available
  • It sets up clear objectives for the mapping, based on the priority needs observed during the needs assessment phase
  • It addresses the whole range of capacities used for the response: technical, but also operational and financial
  • Capacity of the whole WASH sector can be considered, including local markets and local communities’ capacity, and not only the humanitarian WASH actors

Set up a capacity development plan

Map capacities is a mean to end, serving the final objective of improving WASH emergency response priority outputs. Capacity mapping should be followed by the preparation of a capacity development plan, prioritizing and addressing the gaps identified. Prioritization of capacity development actions must be done based on resources available and expected impact of the actions for the response strategy. Each capacity development action should be assigned to a relevant actor, and includes an estimated date of completion.

Monitor capacity development plan implementation

Capacity development includes a large variety of actions: organization of technical training, advocacy to partners to strengthen their operational capacity in a priority zone, advocacy to donors to increase their funding, capacity building of local population or authority for emergency preparedness and response etc. The WASH coordination platform should monitor that the capacity development plan is implemented as planned, and report any deviation or delays observed. Some actions can be coordinated by the WASH coordination unit, although it is usually not directly responsible for their implementation.