Monitor the relevancy of programming modalities and impact
Several types of implementation modalities can be chosen for the WASH responseSome strategic choices regarding implementation modalities were done by HWCP and partners regarding the response in the HRP and the SOF. These choices were done based on the information available at the time. They need to be reviewed regularly to ensure they are still relevant to the evolving emergency context, and be able to re-orientate the strategy if necessary.
The response modalities chosen can be: direct implementation, implementation through support to the local government or local partners, conditional or even unconditional cash transfer. Other strategic choices were They also include technical choices made during the response design, such as choice of latrine design or behavior change strategy. These chosen modalities are described in the WASH operational response plan as well as the SOF. The WASH coordination platform must monitor during and after the implementation the relevancy of the modalities chosen, to be able to re-orientate the strategy if needed.
To be able to evaluate monitor the relevancy of the modalityimplementation modalities, indicators that will be used for the evaluation adequate monitoring indicators must first be selected. They cab Depending on the context, they can be based on the quality assurance framework elements (strategic indicators, coverage, accountability and protection, technical quality), complemented with other more general response indicators , such as follows: Value for money
...
, Timeliness
...
, Institutional capacity strengthening, Do no harm (ex: WASH market monitoring indicators)
...
.