Ukraine WASH Cluster CCPM - Partners

This questionnaire will take less than 30 minutes to complete. All answers will remain anonymous.

It is designed to enable Cluster partners to assess how well their Cluster has achieved its core functions . It focuses on six core and sub-functions of the Cluster, and the Cluster’s accountability to affected populations. The results of the survey will be combined with the results of a similar questionnaire for Cluster coordinators. The findings will be discussed with participants (including cross-cutting focal points) at a dedicated Cluster workshop, where actions to improve performance will be planned if they are needed. Decisions on actions will also be shared (as appropriate) with Cluster lead agencies, national authorities, the Humanitarian Coordinator, and global Clusters.

For each question, please indicate how much you agree or disagree with the statement, or select 'Don't know / Not applicable' if you are unsure.

1. Supporting service delivery

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

The WASH Cluster provides a platform for effective coordination of the response

This is a required question

Information shared by the WASH Cluster Team has improved my understanding of who is doing what where

This is a required question

2. Informing strategic decision-making

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

Assessment results shared by the WASH Cluster Team are providing information useful to my organization's programming

This is a required question

WASH Cluster coordination is allowing us to identify and address new gaps, obstacles and duplication in the response

This is a required question

WASH Cluster coordination assists in the identification of response priorities (example: winterisation, checkpoints, support to the elderly)

This is a required question

3. Planning and strategy development

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

The WASH Section in the Humanitarian Response Plan (HRP) sufficiently identifies priorities and strategic objectives, addressing cross cutting issues

This is a required question

WASH Cluster partners have agreed and applied relevant standards that ensure quality response (for example, litres/person/day, hygiene kit content)

This is a required question

4. Advocacy

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

I am aware of advocacy concerns the WASH Cluster Team raises with the HCT

This is a required question

The WASH Cluster coordination has provided a useful platform to implement advocacy activities on behalf of partners and the affected population

This is a required question

5. Monitoring and reporting

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

The WASH Cluster's performance monitoring indicators capture core activities in a useful manner

This is a required question

6. Contingency planning and preparedness

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

Organizations responding in WASH have a good understanding of contingency response needs in Ukraine

This is a required question

7. Accountability to affected population

Please select how far you agree / disagree with the following statements:

Beneficiaries of WASH responses have the opportunity to feed back on direct assistance received (such as hygiene kits)

This is a required question

Edit this form